CO129-227 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [6] — Page 154

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

products, but can

100 departure

of charge

find nothing to show

on

any

the part of this Office.

was made in 1882 in the

with their on his

or on

of issuing these permits, the Registrar General being directed to deal

responsibility after Consultation with the Surveyor General and Capt. Supt of Police, but this was at the suggestion of the Surveyor General, and not at that of the Registrar General. The Capt. Supt was duly notified of the change; so that, if this is what is referred to as a new

policy by him, he is not correct in saying that it was "adopted without the knowledge of the Head of the Police."

No permit has ever,

aware

that "it was

so far

as

I am

been issued without the Capt. Supt being consulted in the first instance: In August of last

was

year,

permit applied for through this Department, and referred to the Surveyor General and Capt. Supt of Police in the

usual

way. The latter Officer objected to its issue, and I submitted the matter to the

Government, as I thought it only right to call attention to his objection. I was instructed that the Capt. Supt, while recording his opinion, had signed "as on former occasions," so the permit was issued.

This is quoted to show that this Department

such

the Permit

as on

the

did not in any way desire to overlook objections from a responsible officer, the Head of the Police, and that, therefore, the statement that permits

were

granted without reference to the opposition of the Police is not in strict accordance with fact. Indeed,

so

far from thinking that the Police should

not be consulted,

I

as

early

as the 11th Nov last, suggested that the issue of permits "should be left entirely in the hands of the Police and this Department; and, in the event of any difference of opinion, it should be referred to H.E. the Governor for final decision."

The Capt. Supt complains of the

granting

Edit History

2026-05-24 22:06:44 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
products, but can 100 departure of charge find nothing to show on any the part of this Office. was made in 1882 in the with their on his or on of issuing these permits, the Registrar General being directed to deal responsibility after Consultation with the Surveyor General and Capt. Supt of Police, but this was at the suggestion of the Surveyor General, and not at that of the Registrar General. The Capt. Supt was duly notified of the change; so that, if this is what is referred to as a new policy by him, he is not correct in saying that it was "adopted without the knowledge of the Head of the Police." No permit has ever, aware that "it was so far as I am been issued without the Capt. Supt being consulted in the first instance: In August of last was year, permit applied for through this Department, and referred to the Surveyor General and Capt. Supt of Police in the usual way. The latter Officer objected to its issue, and I submitted the matter to the Government, as I thought it only right to call attention to his objection. I was instructed that the Capt. Supt, while recording his opinion, had signed "as on former occasions," so the permit was issued. This is quoted to show that this Department such the Permit as on the did not in any way desire to overlook objections from a responsible officer, the Head of the Police, and that, therefore, the statement that permits were granted without reference to the opposition of the Police is not in strict accordance with fact. Indeed, so far from thinking that the Police should not be consulted, I as early as the 11th Nov last, suggested that the issue of permits "should be left entirely in the hands of the Police and this Department; and, in the event of any difference of opinion, it should be referred to H.E. the Governor for final decision." The Capt. Supt complains of the granting
Baseline (Original)
2. percucts, but can 100 departure of charge find nothing to show on any the part of this Office. was made in 1882 in the with their on his oron of issuing these permits, the Registrar General being directed to deal responsibility after Consultation with the Surveyor Jeveral and Captr. Supt of Police, Best this was at the suggestion of the Survey of teneral, rende not at that of the Registrar General. The Captor Supt was duly notified of the change ; so that, if this is what is referred to as a new policy by him, he is not correct in saying th " adopted without the knowledge of the "Head of the Police." No permit has ever, awares that "it was sofar As Jam been issued without the Capt Supt being consulted in the first instance : In August of last was year, percuit applied for through this Department, and referred to the Surveyor General and Captr Sup! of Police in the usual 152 neval way. The latter Officer objected to its issue, and I submitted the matter to the Government, as I thought it only right to call attention to his objection, I was instructed that the Captr Supt while recording his opinion, had signed " former recasions," so the perucit This is quoted to show that this Repartient such the Perucit as on the was issued. did not in cry way decire to overlook objections from a responsible officer the Head of the Police, and that, therefore the statement that permits. Avere - granted without reference to the opposition of the Police is not in strict accordance with fack. Indeed, 06 far from thinking that the Police should not be consulted, I as early PLO the 11th Nov last, suggested; that the issue of permits "should be left entirely in the hands of the "Police and this Department; and, in the " event of any difference of opinion, the "should be referred to st. E. the Governor for "final decision. matter The Capt. Supt complains of the __ greenting :
2026-05-24 22:06:44 · Baseline
View content

2.

percucts, but can

100 departure

of charge

find nothing to show

on

any

the part of this Office.

was made in 1882 in the

with their on his

oron

of issuing these permits, the Registrar General being directed to deal

responsibility after Consultation with the Surveyor Jeveral and Captr. Supt of Police, Best this was at the suggestion of the Survey of teneral, rende not at that of the Registrar General. The Captor Supt was duly notified of the change ; so that, if this is what is referred to as a new

policy by him, he is not correct in saying th " adopted without the knowledge of the "Head of the Police."

No permit has ever,

awares

that "it was

sofar

As

Jam

been issued without the Capt Supt being consulted in the first instance : In August of last

was

year,

percuit applied for through this Department, and referred to the Surveyor General and Captr Sup! of Police in the

usual

152

neval way. The latter Officer objected to its issue, and I submitted the matter to the

Government, as I thought it only right to call attention to his objection, I was instructed that the Captr Supt while recording his opinion, had signed " former recasions," so the perucit This is quoted to show that this Repartient

such

the Perucit

as on

the

was issued.

did not in cry way decire to overlook objections from a responsible officer the Head of the Police, and that, therefore the statement that permits.

Avere

- granted without reference to the opposition of the Police is not in strict accordance with fack. Indeed,

06

far from thinking that the Police should

not be consulted,

I

as

early

PLO

the 11th Nov

last, suggested; that the issue of permits "should be left entirely in the hands of the "Police and this Department; and, in the " event of any difference of opinion, the "should be referred to st. E. the Governor for "final decision.

matter

The Capt. Supt complains of the __

greenting

:

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.